jackson-dataformats-binary
jackson-dataformats-binary copied to clipboard
FasterXML
Uber-project for standard Jackson binary format backends: avro, cbor, ion, protobuf, smile
My project currently using jackson-dataformat-avro (version 2.12.2) to convert the Java POJO and store it. Just facing problem is that when the schema is evolve then the old data stored...
In avro 1.9.2 - ``` public Object get(String key) { Field field = this.schema.getField(key); return field == null ? null : this.values[field.pos()]; } ``` getString method was handling null value...
Below code works with Jackson 2.8 version but with jackson 2.12x (Jackson-dataformat-ion), deserialization test case fails. Also tried with intializing ionObject mapper by disabling native type ids but it didnt...
# jackson-dataformat-ion polymorphic behaviors ## [SSCCE](http://sscce.org/) to demonstrate behaviors. This sample code depends on `jackson-dataformat-ion`, `jackson-annotations`, `jackson-databind`, and `jackson-core`. ```java import com.amazon.ion.IonValue;// for jackson-dataformat-ion 2.10+ // import software.amazon.ion.IonValue; // for...
It would be nice if there were some programming interface allowing for custom tag-to-type mapping. For instance: CborTag customTag = CborTag.fromInt(customTagValue); CborTagDeserializer customTagDeserializer = new CborTagDeserializer() { ... }; CBORFactory...
Seems the createParser method of SmileFactory and CBORFactory is lacking implementation for java.io.DataInput sources.
(moved from https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformat-avro/issues/28 authored by @osi) I'd like to get the JsonSubTypes annotation working for schema generation and serialization. For schema generation, I think it should be a union of...
While maybe not the biggest problem in the world, there may be use cases where it'd be nice to let users essentially convert data bound in Avro-specific containers (like GenericContainer)...
(moved from https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformat-protobuf/issues/4) Initial generator version does not keep track of required fields, but it should in near future. Required fields for which no explicit value is given should either...
(originally by neothemachine) --- There is a draft RFC to be published soon which adds support for packed/typed arrays in CBOR, see the [current version](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jroatch-cbor-tags-02). As one of the original...