FEA-eng

> @FEA-eng sorry for the delay in response. No problem, I'm glad you're still interested in this topic. > OK I need to understand this better before I can change...

I would propose an icon like this: 

@AjinkyaDahale Would you be able to find some time to go back to this before the next release? Good news is that I started working on the FEM workbench so...

> @FEA-eng I do/will have some downtime this month for sure, in which I can at least share where I had been stuck. IIRC, it seemed there needed to be...

@AjinkyaDahale I fixed most issues (including the blocking one with *CLOAD in the wrong place). When you have some time, please let me know how I can share the updated...

> You can make a PR to this branch (https://github.com/AjinkyaDahale/FreeCAD/tree/fem-rigid-body-constraints). Ok, I'll do it this way then. I just wonder if it's better if you update your branch (it's still...

> In his branch RT has a setting to check or ignore for multiple solids after each operation. IMO that's the easiest way to handle both cases. That would be...

> removing this limitation will be an objective for the next development cycle Is it still on the radar for 0.22/1.0 or rather for the next release after the upcoming...

> What do you think? I will provide PR on Friday if there will be no major opposition. Very good idea, I 100% agree.

Another way to indicate that a feature is suppressed is to add a red cross (or [No symbol](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_symbol)) on the left from it. Or gray it out. Strikethrough name makes...