ExpandingMan

Perhaps, but I don't find the metadata documentation clear at all. Yes, it does seem that the Feather metadata is just it's own thing. I remain confused as to whether...

For an example of how to get FlatBuffers.jl to read it, look at [Feather.jl](https://github.com/JuliaData/Feather.jl).

I don't think that's the right function to call, you are probably looking for `FlatBuffers.read`. You'll probably need to check out the [FlatBuffers.jl documentation](https://juliadata.github.io/FlatBuffers.jl/stable/) and the original flatbuffers documentation linked...

Unfortunately when I wrote this package I had a perspective which was rather skewed by the goal of using the Feather format which, for some reason, seemingly makes a bare...

I had started work on this in [this branch](https://github.com/ExpandingMan/Arrow.jl/tree/completion). I made good progress, but I got derailed from it, for various reasons. I still intend to work on it, but...

I'm not really interested in taking responsibility for maintenance of a full-blown C++ wrapper. However, if you create a full working C++ wrapper package, I would be glad to de-register...

The reason I'm hesitating to embrace this is that I sort of feel that this has to be rebuilt from the ground up, like you see in my new branch....

Sure, take whatever you want. That's the reason it's open source with an permissive license. By the way, I suggest you check out my new branch and try to stick...

I'm not sure whether it's possible, but please don't panic. I did not mean to imply that this was imminent by any means, if this does happen I'm sure it...

I have to say that all this interest is piquing my interest. I'm at least going to get a working minimal prototype out of my new branch, I don't know...