ExpandingMan

Hi, thanks for your feedback, but please note this package is deprecated in favor of [JuliaData/Arrow.jl](https://github.com/juliadata/arrow.jl). I'll put up a notification on the README.

Thanks for your help! In general I find all the legalistic tomfoolery horrifying, but I won't let that stop us unless there actually is some problem here. Would this involve...

Tagging some more Julia people that may have interest in this, apologies if you don't @ararslan @ihnorton @nalimilan @tanmaykm (feel free to add others)

Thanks guys. I think that's good enough for me. I suppose my consternation about the project being harder to work on in the arrow repo just comes from the fact...

The concept of Julia packages are indeed closely tied to git repositories (but not necessarily github). In principle it's possible to make a package out of any type of repository,...

> This project is held together by its inter-language binary integration tests. A single pull request may affect multiple implementations -- if we split the project up into multiple git...

> This is to say, all of this discussion is moot until the Julia implementation is able to consume and produce valid Arrow binary messages, and validate them against a...

@quinnj, any PR would be welcome, in fact I should make you an admin. I don't know what's needed for the message protocols, but I'd imagine it would be quite...

> Building complete binary read and write support and also being able to interface with the JSON integration test format is a sort of big project, I'd guess at least...

Ok, at this point I definitely have every intent of moving this to the monorepo, but we have to figure out what's required on the technical side first. As I've...