Ewout ter Hoeven

Results 224 comments of Ewout ter Hoeven

With the insane performance increase of #48, is SVT-AV1 ready to publish a stable release?

@tianjunwork Thanks, keep me posted!

> Given the experimental status for this feature in setuptools Just a heads up: setuptools [declared](https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/pull/3347) defining metadata in `pyproject.toml` to be stable in June.

@adam-mcdaniel If you would like anything changed or explained please let me know, now this CI configuration is still fresh in my memory :)

@adam-mcdaniel Please let me know if you are interested in some CI for this project! Otherwise I will close this PR.

Hi @farindk and @fancycode, any chance one of you could review this PR?

I'm encountering the [same problem here](https://github.com/EwoutH/EMAworkbench/runs/6258646580?check_suite_focus=true#step:6:32) in our CI setup.

@michaellarabel What do you think? :)

They will be merging [JVET-N0857: slices/tiles/bricks](https://vcgit.hhi.fraunhofer.de/jvet/VVCSoftware_VTM/merge_requests/544) soon, which should add a lot of threading options. It would start to get interesting to track it's performance. The [Doom9 thread](https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=174940) is a...

For Firefox: [Bugzilla issue list](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&classification=Client%20Software&classification=Developer%20Infrastructure&classification=Components&classification=Server%20Software&classification=Other&classification=Graveyard&short_desc=WebCodecs&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&resolution=FIXED&resolution=INVALID&resolution=WONTFIX&resolution=INACTIVE&resolution=DUPLICATE&resolution=WORKSFORME&resolution=INCOMPLETE&resolution=SUPPORT&resolution=EXPIRED&resolution=MOVED)