EvilGremlin
EvilGremlin
Neptune X is robin nano 1.3... defines USES_DIAG_JUMPERS and CS pins etc but photo says there are none
Yep, i see... a bit of a mess. Do you have actual hardware to verify pinouts? Bacause this neptune X v1.0 photo clearly don't match pins.
Nah, let's leave it as is for now. Maybe someone with hardware will show up to verify.
Something's wrong with serial again, it works with just ``` SERIAL_PORT -1 BAUDRATE 115200 ``` but don't connect with ``` SERIAL_PORT -1 BAUDRATE 115200 BAUD_RATE_GCODE SERIAL_PORT_2 1 BAUDRATE_2 115200 ```
Figuring out CI tests is fun :)
Bad image, make good sharp hi-res photo of both sides with PCB traces visible and marking on the chip readable. Looks like we have F4 clone in addition to F1...
This should be same as STM32F469, but i read about differnet interrupt vectors offset and some other funny things https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://blog.csdn.net/jjp969988159/article/details/114976562
Requests are being sent like every day, all pretty much ignored. And let's be honest, their code is mostly garbage in need of complete rewrite. (mostly because they use very...
i'm sure they're just using STM32 framework with custom linker script at most
@jpraczyk i linked article above, NVIC address is main difference, might be some other less prominent ones - but using stm32 frameworks is still easiest way @uski compelled to do...