John Ericson

@darinmorrison couldn't agree with you more. Need to look at Edward's comments more, but I am not sure where he could have gotten that opinion. By separating cannonicalization and definition,...

@zwarich Interesting! Furthermore, Since Rust doesn't allow impure `const`s / `statics` at all, I don't think we'd gain anything from generative functors. My draft RFC proposes much of the functionality...

Bob, thank you for coming here. First things first. Rust does not allow any effectful top-level (or impl-level, the closest thing to module-level) definitions. (Functions defined here can of course...

Mmm sorry, by "they would need to be effect-free" I meant that generative functors in Rust would be able to do only what generative functors do in a "totally pure...

@aciceri is it possible to allow maintainers to push to this branch? Otherwise I can close it an open a new PR.

It's passing locally! (CI should soon catch up :))

Yeah fat binaries, bootloaders written in different mode, cpuid checks for obscure extensions; these all lay waste to tones of assumptions. As to CPPFLAGS, yes meson doesn't really recognize it...

Am I reading that right that you all are open to a contribution from this? I would port over https://github.com/kristapsdz/lowdown/blob/master/term.c This would allow Nix to switch to `cmark` entirely and...

I need a library version, so I am hoping that the commonmark maintainers are happy with that :)

@jgm I actually don't have any issue with the the `man` output per-se. Our use case includes having a self-contained `nix` executable directly output some pretty-pretty documentation on the terminal...