Elesbaan70

@krzychu124 Didn't you say something about pedestrians being handled separately in a way that the code handling regular traffic flow can't see them? Or maybe I misunderstood....

Maybe pedestrians and bicyclists waiting at a light should cause a flag to be set that makes the traffic light want to advance through its steps until they are cleared....

> Whats happening here? I missed that! The existing code is hardcoded to bypass the computation when it's not configurable. (Great example of an unsafe optimization.) Node Controller wasn't affected...

@kianzarrin Have your concerns been addressed? @krzychu124 Have you had a chance to look at this?

> Unfortunately I already noticed (current Test and Stable) that sometimes pedestrians don't care about disabled crossing at highway segments or may even stuck if they finally notice it so...

My concern was that if disabling crossings is what triggers this problem, then until it's resolved, we might want to avoid introducing a disabled default state on nodes where it...

Although MVP1 is quite easy, it might be best to just drop that one from consideration, so the feature doesn't get too confusing. It's actually very rare. Hardly any states...

Does that fall under that side project I've seen videos of?

> what if they are both car lanes? That's the point. Two car lanes with a non-vehicle lane between at a higher vertical offset.

> `LaneGroupFlags` can be added to `ExtLane` from `ExtLaneManager`. That would produce an insane amount of redundant data. This information is all at the `NetInfo` level.