EdJoPaTo

Would the boilerplate be added to this repo? If this is the case I can open a PR so it is easier to discuss specific things with code reviews than...

Since 90ddca26119a1e5c4715c7e37f67300279b7783b this repo only contains one template instead of multiple templates. A TypeScript Boilerplate should be in its own repo which I did with [EdJoPaTo/typescript-node-module-boilerplate](https://github.com/EdJoPaTo/typescript-node-module-boilerplate), PRs and suggestion for...

@RocktimSaikia why not improve existing node module templates made for typescript like the one I created on the basis of this repo (see older comments on this issue)? Having a...

"experienced devs" is interesting as you can not see the experience based on stars, followers, … Are stars mature and stable? Good stuff can and will start without stars. And...

I dedicated a Raspberry Pi 1 with NodeJS 10 (as it is a LTS Version) for the job. A containerised environment might also work with this.

#42 is probably relevant here. I tried getting it to work for my interest which didnt seem to work for me. (unclear why) Would be nice to see improvements there!

I'm not sure if they are useful in libraries as they objective is to be configurable. But I have a bunch of them in projects that running somewhere doing something....

There is. The first part of the rule description even states that: > such as by enforcing all private properties begin with an _, and all global-level constants are written...

I tested around with the following but it didnt seem to work… Not sure why… ```js { selector: 'variable', format: [ 'strictCamelCase', 'UPPER_CASE' ], modifiers: [ 'global', 'const' ] },...

There is no need in adding "+1" comments. That does not change anything. You could instead provide Pull Requests. ;)