lodestar
lodestar copied to clipboard
Linked Data explorer and SPARQL endpoint
This matches `develop/7` branch of https://github.com/virtuoso-opensource. It is based on `release-1.4` branch, and so this pull request also pulls in those changes to master.
Just to let you know, I had to migrate the org.owasp plugin in the main POM, cause it was generating HTTP/404 errors, showing the old version is not aligned the...
Hi all, I came to using LODEStar again after some years, and I've had problems with this Spring block in `ebi-lode-service.xml`: ```xml ``` To me the value above is wrong,...
Currently, `lode-virtuoso-impl` depends on an artifact `virt_jena`. It seems likely to come from https://github.com/openlink/virtuoso-opensource/tree/develop/7/binsrc/jena, but I'm not 100% sure as it must be injected from elsewhere. Correspondence on the virtuoso-users...
There is a build dependency on the repository coconut.ebi.ac.uk: this is an EBI internal server and not visible outside, causing builds to fail. Can we remove this dependency?
Address #31 by updating master from 1.4-release branch
Our newly developed lodestar isn't merged with the current master branch of lodestar, this should be done and potential conflicts fixed
When accessing any "/lodestar/describe" resources by IE11, nothing is shown.
Hello! I noticed the following little UI bug on https://medium.com/virtuoso-blog/benefits-of-a-semantic-web-of-linked-data-for-bioinformatics-62c2964357c >under "both the EBML-EBI and UniProt databases, and has been semantically combined" > screenshot, or [directly in these search results](https://www.ebi.ac.uk/rdf/services/sparql?query=PREFIX+rdf%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F1999%2F02%2F22-rdf-syntax-ns%23%3E%0D%0APREFIX+rdfs%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2F01%2Frdf-schema%23%3E%0D%0APREFIX+owl%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F07%2Fowl%23%3E%0D%0APREFIX+xsd%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2001%2FXMLSchema%23%3E%0D%0APREFIX+dc%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fdc%2Felements%2F1.1%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+dcterms%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fdc%2Fterms%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+dbpedia2%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fproperty%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+dbpedia%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+foaf%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fxmlns.com%2Ffoaf%2F0.1%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+skos%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2004%2F02%2Fskos%2Fcore%23%3E%0D%0A%0D%0APREFIX+obo%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fpurl.obolibrary.org%2Fobo%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+sio%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fsemanticscience.org%2Fresource%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+faldo%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fbiohackathon.org%2Fresource%2Ffaldo%23%3E%0D%0APREFIX+identifiers%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fidentifiers.org%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+ensembl%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Frdf.ebi.ac.uk%2Fresource%2Fensembl%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+ensembltranscript%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Frdf.ebi.ac.uk%2Fresource%2Fensembl.transcript%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+ensemblexon%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Frdf.ebi.ac.uk%2Fresource%2Fensembl.exon%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+ensemblprotein%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Frdf.ebi.ac.uk%2Fresource%2Fensembl.protein%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+ensemblterms%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Frdf.ebi.ac.uk%2Fterms%2Fensembl%2F%3E%0D%0APREFIX+core%3A+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fpurl.uniprot.org%2Fcore%2F%3E%0D%0ASELECT+%3Funiprot_id+%3Funiprot_uri+%3Fisoform+%3Fseq+%7B%0D%0A+++ensembl%3AENSG00000128573+ensemblterms%3ADEPENDENT+%3Funiprot_uri+.%0D%0A++++%3Funiprot_uri+dc%3Aidentifier+%3Funiprot_id+.%0D%0A++++SERVICE+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fsparql.uniprot.org%2Fsparql%3E+%7B%0D%0A+%3Funiprot_uri+core%3Asequence+%3Fisoform+.%0D%0A%3Fisoform+rdf%3Avalue+%3Fseq+.+%0D%0A++%7D+%0D%0A%7D&render=HTML&limit=25&offset=0#loadstar-results-section)....
Our security team is trying out a new scanner, called netsparker. It found something that IBM AppScan never found, which is that parameters sent to the SPARQL endpoint that contain...