DominikKamp

Results 50 comments of DominikKamp

...though `MIP-readertest-mps-blend2.mps` will still fail as described in https://github.com/scipopt/scip/issues/102#issuecomment-2303570179 since LP errors are handled more verbose than necessary but these LP results are withdrawn safely as usual (you can trust...

Suspicious that the backtrace does not show any exact function, especially I wonder why `SCIPbranchExecPseudo()` does not call `SCIPtreeBranchVarExact()`.

The assertion fail is still reproducible on latest `master` and might contribute to weak performance.

Yes, the segmentation fault is probably implied by the branching performance issue and caused by #99 because the tree grows deep before the optimal solution is found, so these are...

Actually the opposite, wrong result for `presolving/milp/maxrounds = 0` ~~~ [exactlinear] : [C]8270221867907345/18014398509481984 >= 3820765208655001139810686681034012291027590459696320853700843549375316393738298896791014703802493547895246209099969671517570644466003311567624873579733615014989722009439763133108438426618496818007015673010596/8322483747016010645078439610003859028640563129539928545927874805901863636153392897190123706584210784609960518831130466619997743570991523350223018408227799092623327557267135166450116594205610454082489013671875; ; 2875258577386804219922059081087637726676897724187146214036535632913738116207318832128314611164381333139048733175520469310672109305487999652599955533190450289926910648742041206464135827381636126983740970680589/149924538807433259370150935573257546206776848727764755833157818845257697497890803345240711711575444825813677167789830311372065208192007026329217006021092308610976492364110653766562290073600000000000000000000000000000000000000violation: left hand side is violated by best solution is not feasible in original...

> It's probably on purpose, but feels a bit strange to have a variable with a CONTINUOUS vtype and var.isIntegral() returning True. The variable type is just more independent from...

Not sure what should have been tested. The implint type just does no longer exist. In principle having a permanent development branch sounds fine, just be aware of that on...

I also believe that if there were a regular development branch, it would be more possible that developers contribute to it, however, some delay makes sense as long as something...

Nowadays, `SCIPiisGreedyMinimize()` is rather called `SCIPiisGreedyMakeIrreducible()`.

For exact SCIP an interface between `fractions.Fraction` and `SCIP_RATIONAL*` would be nice, but maybe rather in the long run because the memory handling might be involved.