Dmitry-Me

Why wouldn't the developers run the thing? They should know the code better and so have a better idea of whether a specific warning is a false positive.

Well, at least with checking one file this should not be hard. As to multiple files - I guess we no longer can check more that one file per cppcheck.exe...

Maybe, but running several instances of cppcheck.exe at the same time will require proper dealing with the output so that they don't interfere with each other.

I'd guess this is because of how paths differ on Windows and Linux. Windows uses backslashes and this might be the reason why paths are not properly found.

Yes, you do. The declaration will not be added to the document structure until you add it explicitly. The test project contains an example (search for `NewDeclaration()` call).

Well, I cannot comment on this, I never saw any code for earlier tinyxml. Perhaps @leethomason has some ideas.

This is most likely because of destructor of `XMLReportBase` not being virtual. How exactly is the object created and deleted where you observe the problem? Do you have a minimal...

Does the same node get added multiple times into the DOM?

What's inside /ctor,dtor,implementation of the pure virtual function, .../ ?

There's good chance that for some reason you have `XMLNode::InsertAfterChild()` called with `insertThis` being equal to `afterThis` and that's the node other than the last one on that level.