DimaLPorNLP

Thank you Carleton, for the quick response. How can I send you this case? Is there somewhere I could upload it? Thanks again!

> I presume this case came from some where online, point me to that place where I can download it. No unfortunately this is not the case. I got it...

> Regarding the Makefiles. They don't work in Windows, and they are hard to revise for all cases where Suitesparse is used. > > The CI of suitesparse tests the...

> This is by design. The Example is not a primary library of SuiteSparse, just an example of how to build an application that depends on Suitesparse. It is meant...

> On windows the cmake build system supports many things: msys2, MSVC,the MS compiler, the Intel compiler, and the list goes on. A makefile can't do that. Thanks for the...

> Regarding the Example: yes, I could configure it to use just the packages that get compiled. But that wouldn't reflect an actual application that needs the libraries it needs...

> The README file documents that already. If you think that something is missing or confusing in that file, that could be improved. But repeating the README across some CMake...

> Maybe, you didn't install the corresponding `-dev` packages that are needed for the headers in some distributions? No I did not install the -dev packages, I just installed the...

> CMake cannot (and should not) carry a database for which files are installed with which package for any existing distribution. And I don't think, there is any build system...

> What does `which gcc` and `which cmake` return for you? The default that come with msys2/UCRT64. ``` $ gcc --version gcc.exe (Rev1, Built by MSYS2 project) 14.2.0 Copyright (C)...