Jody Dillon

> @DillonJ so that's an argument to use `t_consecutive_t` rather than `t_next_t`? I suppose so - but I don't have strong opinions - I think the main thing is it's...

Hi @mihlema Nice spot - I agree that the more elegant solution is a null default value for the coefficients and making the required modifications, I guess so that we...

Possibly something we want to include in milestone TB 1.0?

Hi @datejada @clizbe just to note here that we discussed this a few times and there are use cases for the constraint being an equality, or an inequality - and...

@manuelma for information, @elinaspyrou has posted some additional information in the original issue here: https://github.com/spine-tools/SpineOpt.jl/issues/545

No, with LODF constraint active

Very interesting @jkiviluo I would let the folks over at https://github.com/ERGO-Code/HiGHS know about this. They are very receptive to input and feedback.

I did something on this in my experimental branch (https://github.com/spine-tools/SpineOpt.jl/commit/27c2ad9b8dc44acf3167c1db5e2927a958136bfa) and it's very effective!

I think that what I have done is not perfect, because it also warm starts the investment variables that are fixed to the new Benders solution, but the solver seems...

@manuelma could you please look at this... I'm not sure if what I have done means we all have two copies of the saved solution... I think we might not...