David Q Mertz

Results 15 comments of David Q Mertz

Would this interface be accessible to visually impaired users? I don't know how assistive technology would deal with drag and drop only actions. On Mar 22, 2014 11:26 AM, "Karl...

I'm not sure I understand why the current interface would be an obstacle to screen readers. I should try it in lynx. I definitely agree that the drag to rank...

Apologies. I should have looked at a more recent version; I didn't know it had already done a less good version of drag-to-rank. On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:07...

I believe this is (mostly) correct. The verifiability model for eVote requires that there be a declare size of the voter pool that can be generally verified. I do not...

I'll preface, of course, by noting again that @sigmavirus24 is an honest, intelligent, and careful EA. In the PSF case I would not lack actual confidence if the procedure were...

I served on P1622 for a while, prior and just into, when we/it decided to follow the EML route as our endorsement. I think it _would_ be a good thing...

The P1622 recommendation simply _IS_ EML. For a while we were considering a different XML format that grew out of one of the vendors in-house formats; but fortunately, we gave...

Yep... you have it exactly correct, Karl. On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Karl Fogel [email protected] wrote: > Ahhh. I had thought P1622 was its own format, or...

David Mertz... Co-chair Python Software Foundation Trademarks Committee This version in https://github.com/fallen/Pytition/issues/37#issuecomment-447678287 is clearly derivative and alters the shape. It is not a permissible use. Please look at https://www.python.org/psf/trademarks/. Specifically,...

@fallen I'm awaiting the input of other members of the PSF TC. But my own inclination is that design A is still probably dilutive, simply because it is *too* recognizable...