Daniel VandenHeuvel
Daniel VandenHeuvel
Probably don't need to bother with a keyword, I don't think it'll slow things down too much. If you're able to, would you mind making a PR with that change...
Is this something you still need @asinghvi17?
No worries, there's no rush. I just happened to remember about it today so thought I'd check in. Thanks.
Should now be fixed once v1.0.4 is released
I'm not sure why this is not ideal. The point being added is indeed on a segment and so the segment should get split into two. This is a very...
Hm. I see your point, yes I agree that this could be nice. I think I have an efficient way to implement this. Let me try and get an example...
Haven't been able to get much progress with this since there's a lot of technical details here to do this efficiently (and avoid the annoying amount of edge cases -...
Did any of the above work out for you @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman?
Going to close this due to inactivity and I'm not sure about this feature. The functions I give above maybe work but they won't in general - maybe for your...
I'll re-open this now since maybe I'll try and work on it. This could be added with something like a `strict` keyword (default `false`). There are two approaches to this:...