Dag Brück

> (I can't recall when this added - but Dymola 2018 FD01 also had it.) Note that you also get the same dialog if the connectors are close "enough" even...

Hans Olsson asked me to check in Dymola, and it is a mixed bag. Dymola can present icons in two sizes in the class browser. The bigger "icon view" which...

> Seems that further tool investigation is needed. I think the bottom line is basically that SystemModeler gets it right. At least for these icons.

I have problems with your example involving records `A` and `B`. Your example is correct Modelica, but it is not correct C, which uses name-equvalence instead of structural equivalence. Ok,...

>> I have problems with your example involving records `A` and `B`. Your example is correct Modelica, but it is not correct C, which uses name-equvalence instead of structural equivalence....

Just a reminder that the issue about export control has not been resolved. Currently, a tool such as Dymola is not regarded as sensitive because it does not allow user-defined...

> So, to summarize, the proposed approach seems to be uncritical with regards to EU export control regulations. Maybe so, but that possibly does not help us because we also...

To answer your original question, I think the answer should be "no". I think the current wording makes it (sufficiently) clear that portable models should only use the listed file...

Really, some organization with more authority on the topic than MA should already have decided such a naming convention? Let's just steal something and point to the source.

> I assume there are similar considerations for gcc. Well, at least we have the problem with different Linux kernels and libc, although the issues for complete applications with GUI...