DS-AdamMilazzo

I hope this feature makes it in. :-)

I don't have a business case. I just believe that if we take the word "type" to mean "a declaration that defines a set of allowable values" then properly speaking...

I would suggest that the "final" feature is not needed for this, and you could get the desired savings in more situations via a more general mechanism. Since objects are...

> Note that type determination based on the type of the property only works if you assume that the model doesn't change between when the instance was serialised and when...

It seems that your understanding of my proposal is that we allow $class to be omitted when and only when there's exactly one concrete type that a field could possibly...

I am not familiar with the python client, but I think there are two problems with that code. 1. I think that by default, the python client wraps your commands...

Are you sure they're run serially? There seems to be _some_ overlap in the time ranges in the Citus result, albeit much less...

Hello, again. Can you guys provide any kind of an ETA on this? Thank you.

I don't think it's quite the same. #542 still requires `$class` fields where it would be ambiguous without them. I don't know what it means to talk about a "payload...

Why not just treat objects as instances of the declared field type if $class is omitted? It's much simpler than a `final` annotation and more general. Your example doesn't match...