Dominique St-Amand
Dominique St-Amand
I can confirm what @defyjoy posted. Just tried myself. Could the regex be updated?
Hey, Yes Microsoft.Extensions.* should be backwards compatible. I was just wondering considering that they will bump the version to 3.0 of these packages if you planned on following as well
azurerm_windows_web_app using a azurerm_service_plan with WindowsContainer gives 500 when access app
@xiaxyi what could differ in terms of environment ? if the azurerm provider is sending out JSON payload to the ARM management plane? And are you making sure you tested...
azurerm_windows_web_app using a azurerm_service_plan with WindowsContainer gives 500 when access app
@xiaxyi If you navigate to the web app you will get the default web app quickstart. You won't get the image itself. Your os_type should be WindowsContainer as the serverFarm...
azurerm_windows_web_app using a azurerm_service_plan with WindowsContainer gives 500 when access app
@xiaxyi PUT with body ```json { "properties": { "netFrameworkVersion": "v6.0" } } ``` worked. The webapp was available once that setting was set. Also confirmed by destroying the resources and...
azurerm_windows_web_app using a azurerm_service_plan with WindowsContainer gives 500 when access app
Any news @xiaxyi ? Would be great for the code to take this in consideration automatically :-). If not a remark in the docs.
I was able, through the other [issue](https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-dotnet-worker/issues/423), to get structured logging to show up in application insights. Here's a snippet on how to get this going. Note that I deployed...
@makshh you should consider doing a pull-request so that others can benefit from it when the developers accept the pull