Artem Medvedev

Yes, these commands are executed before returning `Container` instance form the `start` But there is no retries of the command itself. We retry only the check of the exit status...

Yes, as I mentioned above - there is no retry of the command itself for now. It seems to be a candidate for a separate feature(?). But as a workaround...

Btw, speaking of `postgres`, do such conditions not work for you? https://github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-rs-modules-community/blob/66bbad597d4bbed30ef210e6a0afdb64089a3bb7/src/postgres/mod.rs#L86 (based on [this issue](https://github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-rs-modules-community/issues/158)) These ones are widely used across different implementations of testcontainers (Java, Go, etc) I'd...

I think ability to retry command should be incorporated into testcontainers. See no issues with that. Let's keep this item, I'll implement it later if if no one willing to...

I’m curious if #814 addresses the issue. It’s slightly different, but it’s quite natural for Docker. It allows you to set a custom healthcheck (including a cmd, the number of...

That's a good research, thank you! I think we need to improve the experience with podman. Also, Testonctiners usually have separate guide for alternative engines, e.g [Go version](https://golang.testcontainers.org/system_requirements/using_podman/). We need...

> Alternatively, it may be valid to do something similar as testcontainers-go is doing, i.e. ignore the differentiation of IPv4 and IPv6 Personally, I find the differentiation useful, it provides...

I'd vote for deprecation as well, because `HeaderMap` can be considered as quite specific wrapper with clear purpose, so if it can be fully safe API, why not? It has...

Hi and thanks for the report 👋 > I had to fork postgres container and remove this [line](https://github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-rs-modules-community/blob/main/src/postgres/mod.rs#L129), leaving only stderr check, to make it work. This line exists intentionally...

> I think it should be general note on most methods in ImageExt, since testcontainer is probably tested against specific image, tag, ready conditions, etc. Yes, that's true. It's applicable...