D-Stacks

Converting back to draft: Makes more sense to optionally return the whole tx, this can be used by clients to send, and get tx data for post-analysis, no reason to...

I will split this into two dependent prs, one for feecalcs, one for sending back whole tx data, seems to make the most sense.

I will do this i actually think these would be interessting stats to have. I will do uptime specifically in GetInfo / maybe also number of rpc clients, and max...

Converting back to draft. I will apply a notification stream and implement all testing which does not require dag params to be overwritten.

is this an important test, or why is it still in the PRs while being so old?

> Functional part looks good to me. However tests look too repetitive. Wdyt about using array and for-loop/iterator? In addition, it is possible to make ip intanzation only once One...

> This looks to be getting implemented by @D-Stacks in https://github.com/D-Stacks/rusty-kaspa/blob/8397edb4ae138d34c70876382d12c761cc10e1ef/components/consensusmanager/src/session.rs#L253 which is in PR #401 should i add this directly into this pr? i changed internal consensus api to...

I think this is centralization, and can probably be exploited by dns nodes (altering of timestamps) to stop participation. I think dns should just be a one-time entry to collect...

- eUTXO model.

- base58 encoded addresses