Silent

> (Hint: you can use block_walk and malloc while the kernel is stopped and even inside the critical section. Do not forget to start the kernel back, or exit from...

Perhaps the FAP version is more attainable, even if it comes at a cost of less usable memory? It's a really cool incentive, even though the flash space concerns are...

> The optional compiler would just be required to develop own Python files and use the REPL. This sounds reasonable to me - I wasn't aware MicroPython doesn't interpret .py...

Would this idea accomplish much? There are many services running on the device at any point and FreeRTOS employs dynamic allocation, so if you used the result of such a...

FWIW from the user's point of view this PR is worth it even for this > Fixes incorrect paths when these app storage macros are used in timer / service...

Rebased on 0.98.2 and its API level - should be good to go.

Note: The merge incrementing the minor API version is probably wrong due to the removal of `saved_struct_get_payload_size`. It should probably become level 56.0.

> To be honest I'm still thinking what to do with this PR. The const-correctness change should be unambiguously an improvement, since as far as I can tell it's currently...

> Do you mind if we move this PR to next release? That's fine! It's not a high priority change at all.

Updated for 0.99.1.