Jonathan

After seeing vinci6k's comment and jordanbriere's commit, I came up with an implementation that merges both of them. This commit is for the core-part (C++). https://github.com/CookStar/Source.Python/commit/d739f6e1b906c078a78b1b106df9224f9baefb96 Sure, this is still...

> It could also be optimized by looping yourself instead of relying on `And` and `Or`. This would not only cut the amount of iterations by half, but would also...

> After seeing vinci6k's comment and jordanbriere's commit, I came up with an implementation that merges both of them. > This commit is for the core-part (C++). [CookStar@d739f6e](https://github.com/CookStar/Source.Python/commit/d739f6e1b906c078a78b1b106df9224f9baefb96) I have...

Any suggestions or opinions?

> The thing is that you shouldn't have to worry about other plugins. The idea with isolated filtering is that plugins do not clash with each others. As long as...

> Hence why there is a need for dynamic filtering, and the optimization comes by allowing scripters to have predefined static states so they can limit and reduce the calls...

> I don't think I am missing your point. You want your plugin to be able to override every others whenever you say so. Which as I said; promote clashes...

> How is it dangerous? They are filters, not listeners. If the first callback determined it wants to override the transmission then there is nothing else to filter and there...

> Definitely not as I've explained above, but that isn't the point I was trying to make. SP without plugins should do as less as possible. It shouldn't register a...

> I don't think that is inconsistent nor strange. As long as the behaviour is documented I don't think this is an issue. The likelihood of someone needing to do...