ConjuringCoffee

OK, thanks for the explanation! This seems inconsistent to the handling of multi-line string concatenation though. Take a look at the example below. I wouldn't have expected any changes here....

I've seen too much code working with unsorted table types and expecting the table entries to be appended. Such a rule wouldn't be useful to me as it would be...

> But for standard (=unsorted?) tables there is no difference, both instructions do the same, don't they? You're right. Here's a quote from the documentation: > For standard tables, each...

There's a dedicated issue for `CORRESPONDING` now: https://github.com/SAP/abap-cleaner/issues/266

Thank you for the quick and elaborate response! Your basic idea is sound, but to me it would be important to be able to have the settings independently from the...

Hi Jörg-Michael, here's how I'd imagine it: - I want to set up a combination of a profile and a CDS naming file for each of my ABAP projects. -...

Awesome, thank you! You even went the extra mile by providing a code snippet on how to read the view and field names via ABAP. You impress again!

Hi Jörg-Michael, would it be possible to have a link or a button to your custom settings within the "Preferences" menu? That would be sufficient to me. For example, the...

Hmm, good questions! > What if PROTECTED SECTION was the only empty section, would you still want it to be attached to the PRIVATE SECTION? I have to admit, that...

> Maybe we could delete empty sections at all (doing it always manually in the moment) There is actually a rule for that called "Remove empty class definition SECTIONs". (Personally,...