ConjuringCoffee

I'd like to come back to this topic, specifically this section: https://github.com/SAP/styleguides/blob/main/clean-abap/sub-sections/Exceptions.md#why-cx_no_check-doesnt-help > cx_no_check also doesn't help. Although it makes the method bodies work, the METHODS lower_method definition now is...

Do you handle the use of `BEGIN OF` & `END OF` differently? Personally, I prefer to chain these types of declarations. They definitely belong together, so chaining them makes sense...

OK, thanks for the explanation. I believe this information could be better conveyed in the guideline. I have proposed a change to this section.

I'd like to push this discussion to hopefully come to a conclusion. The section has been challenged for over 1.5 years now. Let's summarize the previous arguments: - SAP Help...

I agree it is "twice as hard" if you change it manually. However, you can also use ADT's renaming feature to rename the variable. Base code: ``` DATA sales_order TYPE...

This problem still persists with gCTS. When imported into a target system, the order of the method implementations is not kept. The pattern by which the method implementations are ordered...

@larshp, I was trying to find out what the purpose of the characteristics `ZAOC_ENCAPSULATION`, `ZAOC_ENCAPSULATION_OBJECTS` and `ZAOC_ENCAPSULATION_PACKAGES` is. It looks like it was in preparation for this check (CHECK_61), right?...

I believe the functionality is still relevant. 😊 A check like this would enable to check encapsulation even if the system isn't fully working with abapGit / abapLint. (Ours certainly...

@jelliottp, was this issue successfully fixed by #1106? :)

The section was removed in: https://github.com/SAP/styleguides/pull/307 I suggest closing this issue 😊