Clean Coder
Clean Coder
> @hrumhurum > > See #188 > > `const` means something very different to the C# compiler. `const` locals don't exist in IL, and `const` fields aren't proper fields that...
> @CleanCodeX > > C# already treats them differently, `readonly` vs `const`. The latter has a _lot_ of restrictions since it must be evaluated by the compiler and it must...
I see no reason why: const a = 3; const b = "a"; cannot be compiled as const int a = 3; const string b = "a"; if some wants...
> I wasn't commenting on that specific syntax decision, only that `const` doesn't mean "immutable" and shouldn't be conflated with the other proposal to add such locals to the language....