Hristos Nenkov

> [@ChrisX101010](https://github.com/ChrisX101010) What utils am I missing at [#9567](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/9567) ? I don't need 100% minimal set. It should save 5 min+/ 1 CI run. Hey @oech3 I think first we...

> [@ChrisX101010](https://github.com/ChrisX101010) What utils am I missing at [#9567](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/pull/9567) ? I don't need 100% minimal set. It should save 5 min+/ 1 CI run. Maybe include: UTILS="du ln mkdir rm...

> Thankyou. getfattr setfattr is not coreutils btw. Also I noticed that `whoami` seems used. ah you are right i apologize, so I guess these need to be added to...

> `--features` are managed by `build-gnu.sh`. `attr` is installed via CI. But runner's GNU coreutils are not used by its framework (deliberately blocked?). export SKIP_TESTS="tests/ls/selinux tests/misc/selinux" for now?

> No. Regression for faster build time would not accepted. PR should have advantage only. build-gnu.sh script has this build logic: ```"${MAKE}" PROFILE="${PROFILE}" SKIP_UTILS=more CARGOFLAGS="${CARGO_FEATURE_FLAGS}"``` , maybe this ```SKIP_UTILS=more``` it...

because the CI will run these two ```getfattr``` ```setfattr``` in system versions since they are external not part of coreutils, I doubt this is an issue.

> UTILS you (and I) listed is still incomplete (and difficult to grep strict UTILS from GNU test suite probably). > > Extending SKIP_UTILS is reasonable. but difficult to save...

> UTILS you (and I) listed is still incomplete (and difficult to grep strict UTILS from GNU test suite probably). > > Extending SKIP_UTILS is reasonable. but difficult to save...

it builds on my end after i installed this dev library

> There are no missing package in the CI (Fedora VM). Missing utils are part of coreutils surely since I don't change > > [coreutils/.github/workflows/GnuTests.yml](https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/blob/67ede852a0f3e752f815a45d3cc7d70a55335b27/.github/workflows/GnuTests.yml#L271) > > Line 271 in...