Christopher Rackauckas

...

Fixed the title. Indeed at this point it's not really a question of what the issue is anymore, it's been repeated dozens of times. Julia's Homebrew build doesn't evaluate Julia...

@Wimmerer I noticed you were working on some?

Definitely, thanks for pointing this out.

```julia ERROR: AssertionError: SciMLBase.LinearSolution{Float64, 1, Vector{Float64}, Float64, KrylovJL{typeof(Krylov.gmres!), Int64, Tuple{}, Base.Pairs{Symbol, Union{}, Tuple{}, @NamedTuple{}}}, LinearSolve.LinearCache{Matrix{Float64}, Vector{Float64}, Vector{Float64}, SciMLBase.NullParameters, KrylovJL{typeof(Krylov.gmres!), Int64, Tuple{}, Base.Pairs{Symbol, Union{}, Tuple{}, @NamedTuple{}}}, Krylov.GmresSolver{Float64, Float64, Vector{Float64}}, IdentityOperator, IdentityOperator,...

@wsmoses is this saying you can't have inactive things in a struct with active things? That doesn't make sense because having `nothing` in a struct is fine?

But I've labelled all algs (and thus GMRES) as inactive, so why would it give me an error that it has mixed activity?

oh yeah oops. But wait, I can't have an inactive field in the solution type? There's cases where there's `nothing` and that's fine?

So I am still not quite getting it. Why is this algorithm not allowed while the other ones are? I added the dispatch so that it would be treated just...

Yes, is there a way to mark that field as inactive?