Christopher Rackauckas

I think the tests are showing this is leading some issues / ambiguities?

It grabs this package https://github.com/SciML/SciMLBase.jl/actions/runs/14602553998/job/41007048826?pr=988#step:6:177 devs the downstream https://github.com/SciML/SciMLBase.jl/actions/runs/14602553998/job/41007048826?pr=988#step:6:626 and then runs. Rebase, I did a lot of releases with minor test fixes today so maybe if it's just rerun...

> I'm still confused about [this MethodError vs BoundsError](https://github.com/SciML/SciMLBase.jl/actions/runs/14674307937/job/41188182534?pr=988#step:6:1404), though. It might not be a problem with versioning, but simply that my computer and Github give different results. It passes...

Check `a=1.0; @inbounds a[1]` in your REPL with `--bounds-check=false/true` and you'll see the difference.

> Is @test_throws Union{MethodError, BoundsError} OK yes

What exactly is this for?

If the steps failed and the Newton algorithm diverged, I think we'd still error out unless the system had a bool set to just continue?

I still don't understand what this is for. @oscardssmith should we talk about this? Is there a test that should go with this?

`true` isn't quite good enough for what we need. We need more verbosity levels. What we need is in SciMLBase and AbstractVerbosity with BVPVerbosity being an instantiation struct, where `BVPVerbosity(true)`...

We could start going into multidimensional interpolations, but we just haven't yet. 1D had a lot of work and I feel like we're finally getting to the conclusion there, maybe...