ChicChip

1. unit test will pass `func TestGetNegativeValue(t *testing.T) {` `num := int64(14)` `bsi := NewDefaultBSI()` `for i:=-num; i

> Are you attempting to set columnId to a negative value? > […](#) > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 8:02 AM ChicChip ***@***.***> wrote: 1. unit test will pass...

Test code read my file "total.bin" `file, _ := os.OpenFile(path+"/total.bin", os.O_RDWR, 0755)` `defer file.Close()` `total := roaring64.NewDefaultBSI()` `total.ReadFrom(file)` `t := time.Now().UnixNano()` `res := total.CompareValue(0, roaring64.RANGE, 25, 30, nil)` `fmt.Printf("totalCount[%v], count[%v],...

> I will run some tests in my environment. In the meantime, could we come up with a better more descriptive name for this function? yes, more descriptive name is...

> Also (and better yet), when constructing the BSI we could potentially set min/max value providing some context about the nature of the data being stored in the BSI. Then...

> I'm also interested in the progress of this. > > Are you still working on this @ChicChip? bsi32 and bsi64 are supported in commit, but this request(https://github.com/RoaringBitmap/roaring/pull/461#issuecomment-2500974153) about set...