Cecilie Svenningsen

A more simple version of my question: When I upload the MICA dataset as an zip archive, contributor metadata is read correctly. But if I download the metadata-only file as...

Thank you for submitting the change request @camiplata. I can confirm that GBIF publishers (recently University of Seychelles (UniSey); Island Biodiversity & Conservation Centre (IBC)) have requested a way to...

Thank you for the elaboration @bsenterre. I think the explanation here is a good argument for including the value in establishmentMeans as nativeEndemic and as a subcategory of Native >...

Good point @dbloom! It would make more sense to be notified beforehand so you do not go through the whole mapping process before you realize the problem. @mike-podolskiy90 you think...

Could you please check these as well? | Name 1 | Name 2 | Issue reported | |-|-|-| | Phlebia livida subsp. tuberculatum Hallenb. & E. Larss. | Phlebia tuberculata...

what happens if it is not readable? @ahahn-gbif and I agree it would be nice with some visible outcome, otherwise, it seems almost like it does not do anything

Relevant Discourse thread on the topic: https://discourse.gbif.org/t/when-to-assign-a-new-doi-to-an-existing-dataset/2319/3

Maybe this would be relevant here as well?: https://github.com/gbif/ipt/issues/1900#issuecomment-1333406617

If one was to charter a task group for this term, then which interest group would it be under?

Thank you for catching this @dr-shorthair - in that case, I think this mismatch should be handled by a task group. I wonder if it makes sense to propose an...