Bruno Sánchez

Same here, using Ubuntu 20.04

I will take this feat.

This would be the solution? `np.ma.mask_or(new_img.data.mask, ref_img.data.mask, shrink=False)`

This is due to a change of API of `attrs`. I will generate a patch for this. Thanks

Hi! This looks strange. It seems related to the background when the code measures the PSF. As if the PSF would tend to sit on a negative background or similar......

Hi, can you give me more details? What is the mask output? I am not actively working on the code for a long time, but would be nice to hear...

Hi, this issue seems to be related with the mask setting. Apparently it fails to enlarge the mask. What kind of data are you using? Are these telescope images? Is...

Sorry, can you send me more info? Maybe I can look at your images/masks and check for details that might be relevant. Do you have any results to show? Is...

OK, I just checked and I will need access. But whenever you get to the subtraction stage post the results here, then I will look.

Yes I could access it. Is this synthetic data? It looks like the PSF is quite broad and as if every star had the same brightness. What calibration are you...