Bockeman

Please could someone indicate why this issue is still sitting in "0. Needs triage". I see some thumbs up and watching, but no comment. Have I supplied all the info...

Would someone mind explaining to me why this issue is still sitting in "0. Needs triage". I'd appreciate: "Yep, this does need looking at, but no one is available right...

The change in behaviour of the sequence parser also affects other examples which rely on `positions.position_of()` (e.g annotation.cpp). I think this needs some careful thought. I personally do not see...

_An aside: this is my bad:_ @Kojoley wrote > There are fundamental design choices that are conflicting: 1) sequence parser rolls back the iterator 2) error handler does not have...

@djowel wrote: > FWIW, I have full confidence in @Kojoley. I just want to make sure the changes do not cause any confusion and lots of headache in having to...

@Kojoley I have started to look at your solution prototype and have come across some things which I was not expecting. The first is in the tutorial `complex_number.cpp` ``` /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////...

@Kojoley your latest push fixes the `complex_number.cpp` and related cases. Thanks.

I have another example of some unexpected behaviour. This is based on code you supplied when exploring #679 ``` // Original from Nikita using boost::variant #include #include #include #include namespace...

I'm puzzled. The link https://godbolt.org/z/M5KMsnobG points to the code I supplied above, and I see that you get the same compile time error. You said > I don't think it...

Oh, (slightly embarrassed), `emplace_back()` is a std::vector method; nothing to do with spirit. I agree, that example should not compile. It leaves a potentially awkward question of why > This...