Bob Hanson

this has been a message for a long time. I have been assured by Mozilla developers that it is meant only as a guiding principle, not that it will be...

Also, you shouldn't need -x if you use JmolData instead of Jmol, as that version is headless.

Since we are talking about a data transfer spec, I do think this is within scope. The following is in relation to the sparce-array issue, but I suggest it could...

OK, "shape" it is. _RLE_ I think something like this would work. - These are controlled arrays in a defined context; the parser will always know to expect a float...

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Daniel Smith wrote: > Putting compression inside the spec itself could cause quite a few issues > of interoperability as these libraries...

For Jmol -- and visualization in general, I think, it doesn't really matter if the format is lossless or not; binary or not; compressed or not. Because the visualization is...

While not ideal, I agree that this is the simplest, least disruptive approach. Thank you! Working now to get Jmol to read the entire file in the case of suspect...

Jmol 14.32.59 now identifies an optimade data stream by the presence of one of **"cartesian_site_positions":**, **"api_version":**, or **optimade** in the first 16K bytes (or in the full file when the...

It is definitely a property of a data element (one element of the array, as opposed to the overall set of records). I agree that it is not something to...

This sounds great to me. But can you have theoretical PD? Re there two concepts here? data[i].nature: {"experimental"|"theoretical"} data[i].method: {"single crystal diffraction"|"powder diffraction"}