BatBushRacks

@lgalabru I agree... this seems like it was rushed while the devs continue to hide from the fact that users are upset about the lack of discourse on https://github.com/ordinals/ord/pull/2109... I...

> > @lgalabru I agree... this seems like it was rushed while the devs continue to hide from the fact that users are upset about the lack of discourse on...

@veryordinally respectfully... what is the decision on https://github.com/ordinals/ord/pull/2109... lots of noise but no commitment... very simple... are the devs with the community or against the community?

Looks like a fix for bug https://github.com/ordinals/ord/pull/2145#issuecomment-1575692362 under development here... https://github.com/ordinals/ord/pull/2154... you say "document the solution we implemented to maintain backwards compatibility"... but where is the documentation? excited to read...

@SharinganKazekage for sure these cursed inscriptions should be supported as valid NFTs... I feel for your situation... a lot of people are in the same boat all because of the...

@raphjaph @veryordinally first off thank you for being open source devs... irregardless of no open discussion... any update on https://github.com/ordinals/ord/pull/2109... why is it being straight up disregarded?

> > @raphjaph @veryordinally first off thank you for being open source devs... irregardless of no open discussion... any update on #2109... why is it being straight up disregarded? >...

> > > @raphjaph @veryordinally first off thank you for being open source devs... irregardless of no open discussion... any update on #2109... why is it being straight up disregarded?...

> I think there is an edge case not covered: > > if there is just one inscription in a tx but not in input 0, it is cursed but...

@veryordinally thank you so much for this info... all sounds like a great plan... what about the bound or unbound treatment of https://github.com/ordinals/ord/pull/2109... you mention "temporarily" for the other types......