Baptiste Cecconi
Baptiste Cecconi
Hi @rebeccaringuette, I agree with your statements. The crosswalk I initiated should really be seen as a way to see what is missing on our side, as you say.
@dgarijo I updated all fields according to your comments. The only remaining issue may be the "funding" term, which could be mapped to 2 entities in SPASE (as you propose)....
This is good to go for me.
Yes, I think so. I was not sure that topic was the place to push for the implementation of `group`, specifically.
ok, great :-)
> @BaptisteCecconi , did you have a specific use case that you would like me to verify is now possible? (Or even some pseudocode for what you were trying to...
To me the [schema:producer](https://schema.org/producer) is really about media production entities (as in: the entity who oversees, manages, organises the production of a film or a music album). In our case,...
@rebeccaringuette This is up to us to define what belongs to the `prov:Activity` and to the `prov:Entity`. Your proposal to put everything in the entity is fine. My comment would...
About the content of the `@id` field: in the [JSON-LD definition](https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/#syntax-tokens-and-keywords), it is told that `@id` are node identifiers and should be IRIs. The IRIs are an extension of URIs,...