Bauke Scholtz
Bauke Scholtz
> AFAIR we have already breaking changes like making FacesMessage.Severity to enum? if a user weirdly uses this, it might break already The enum usage is 100% backwards compatible with...
Fully agree. Hence, @arjantijms do you know a backdoor which would allow us making this compile-time incompatible change? Or perhaps @mnriem? To summarize, we'd like to change in StateHelper ```...
The "jakarta faces end user" usage will be unaffected indeed. But we're talking about the **implementation** of the StateHelper interface. I.e. the actual code of whatever instance is returned by...
I fully agree but I don't control JEE spec rules. According to the current JEE spec rules, such change would block the inclusion of Faces 5.0 in JEE 12. cc:...
Implemented except for `Object eval(Serializable key, Supplier defaultValueSupplier)` due to backwards compatibility.
Reopening because backwards incompatibility is no issue for major version (as long as it's in changelog) and we now have control over old-TCK.
Great proposal, +1.
Created PR for Mojarra; only still need to look how to fit in the spec and create an IT for TCK.