BFO
BFO copied to clipboard
BFO repository including source code and latest documents
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/[email protected]/) on May 10, 2013 09:23:14_ as(history_of)[Elucidation: b history_of c if c is a material entity or site and b is a history that is the unique history of...
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/[email protected]/) on May 07, 2013 18:03:40_ Following the TCQ draft nomenclature? _Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/bfo/issues/detail?id=170_
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/[email protected]/) on May 07, 2013 13:19:10_ The inverse of permanent generic part of is not permanent generic has part. This is easy to see in that, in general the...
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/100840849128868144328/) on May 07, 2013 12:25:46_ I have many use cases that need to link a process with time or date. For example, - blood specimen collected at 4:30...
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/[email protected]/) on April 29, 2013 23:50:20_ Per Stefan's comment on Issue 43 , with Alan in concurrence. _Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/bfo/issues/detail?id=166_
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/115850439786749293234/) on April 24, 2013 15:15:10_ We had been using BFO_0000052 for inheres_in (atemporal) and BFO_0000053 for bearer_of. These are declared inverses in RO. BFO2 has re-used these URIs...
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/100840849128868144328/) on April 23, 2013 16:37:38_ Relations 'precedes' and 'preceded by' have be widely used in OBO Foundry community and are generic relations to represent the order of processes....
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/115850439786749293234/) on April 17, 2013 11:40:29_ There is a lack of documentation describing how to model common biological or biomedical scenarios using BFO. For example, if a user wishes...
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/[email protected]/) on April 07, 2013 20:32:50_ The following statement is incorrect: "Object aggregate is to be treated as a close analogue of set of objects, in the mathematician’s sense;...
_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/115850439786749293234/) on March 17, 2013 14:16:55_ I am fairly sure the property chain declarations in the current BFO2 ontology are incomplete. E.g. I think there should be - InverseOf(continuant-part-of-at-all-times)...