Aurora Twinkle

I also have the same question.Does the community have plans to add metrics for nameserver?

> Why can't this logic be written by the person writing the listener? I think it adds extra complexity to an already complicated client Yeah, the solution you mentioned can...

> IMO the surface area the client already exposes is way too big. It feels any person that wanted to scratch their own itch just added their feature without holding...

> With the help of @liangyepianzhou I was able to fully figure out all the context required to understand what this PIP is all about. If I summarize it: When...

> With the help of @liangyepianzhou I was able to fully figure out all the context required to understand what this PIP is all about. If I summarize it: When...

> The use case looks a little strange, why don't > > ```java > Consumer consumer = pulsarClient.newConsumer(Schema.INT64) > .topic("persistent://public/default/my-topic") > .subscriptionName("my-subscription2") > .messageListener((consumer, message) -> { > // process...

> > With the help of @liangyepianzhou I was able to fully figure out all the context required to understand what this PIP is all about. If I summarize it:...

> I support the motivation, make MessageListener executor isolate is indeed a good point. But I hold a conservative attitude towards the implementation. I have explained why we cannot use...

> I understand you introduce `MessageListenerExecutor` is for the purpose of keep consume messages in ordering, but the point is the API design. > > I had read the implementation...

> > I understand you introduce `MessageListenerExecutor` is for the purpose of keep consume messages in ordering, but the point is the API design. > > I had read the...