Aurélien Jaquier comments

Results 31 comments of


                                            Aurélien Jaquier

burst_mean_freq does not behave as expected

Only mean_freq.

burst_mean_freq does not behave as expected

The previous implementation of the feature assumed that if a burst is detected, there was probably a 1st burst before that one. I kept that in the new implementation, but...

burst_mean_freq does not behave as expected

In the example @DrTaDa provided, I think the current implementation could actually create another problem: the long ISI between the 1st spikes could bias the median, and thus we might...

burst_mean_freq does not behave as expected

I have a new strategy to detect the bursts. Tell me if it looks decent enough to you. In the current implementation, we detect the beginning of a burst when...

burst_mean_freq does not behave as expected

Great ! Then I'll close this issue.

Arbor cable cell exporter

@lukasgd about tox, I usually have this error when I have installed a tox with version < 4, while having `minversion` set to 4 in the tox.ini. Have you tried...

new features: postburst_slow_ahp_values, time_to_postburst_slow_ahp

@DrTaDa done :)

new features: postburst_slow_ahp_values, time_to_postburst_slow_ahp

This should solve Issue #282

new features: postburst_slow_ahp_values, time_to_postburst_slow_ahp

@anilbey sure we can wait, no problem. This is waiting from April anyway

add new feature AHP_depth_from_AP_begin_voltage (and slow version)

I don't think you should change AHP_depth_slow behavior. Ignoring the first peak is not a bug, it is a feature. I think the reason is because we can encounter traces...