Atrue
Atrue
@SerkanSipahi Yep, it is. Go on, you can create a pull request for this
Is it still reproducible?
What library do you use for testing workers? I can suggest creating another module for WebSocket (and import it from the worker) and trying to mock this module using jest...
Anyway, it's not enough to mock the WebSocket, you need all the code inside the worker scope. So you need to have also a Server instance from this module and...
According to their documentation, you can provide a `WebSocketImpl` class if you don't want to use native one https://www.apollographql.com/docs/react/api/link/apollo-link-ws/#options
Buffer is a Node module, but this library is supposed to mock the client web socket and is not supposed to create a copy of the Node WebSocket implementation (Anyway...
@spacehash Can you please provide a minimal reproducible test case?
Hi, @vaughnkoch. According to the details, you are using 3 libraries and one of them has a conflict with the api. So right now it’s hard to say what’s the...
Hi @amcdnl. What do you think about it? A note about the failing build, it’s because of `peer react@"^16.8.0 || 17.x" from @reach/[email protected]`. It uses the react implementation in 18...
@amcdnl Thanks for the answer 1. You can check this commit https://github.com/reaviz/reaflow/pull/235/commits/6718f48f4a501e49e7226e2e95a2806c90b1805d. As you see the only change for the library consumers is to change passing JSX to render function...