Arne Babenhauserheide
Arne Babenhauserheide
Did you move forward with this?
Here’s also a larger (and therefore more risky) pull-request that adds multithreaded operation on mapnik. Maybe it could be useful for you: https://github.com/mapproxy/mapproxy/pull/447/ It uses precise caching and per-thread re-use...
In https://github.com/mapproxy/mapproxy/pull/401#issuecomment-482585407 I was asked to add a test for this, but I need some support: > A test fitting that could be to request map_obj() from a single instance...
This pull-request speeds up mapnik-operations by at least factor 4, and I would love to see it merged in mapproxy so others can benefit from the improvement, too.
It’s been another 6 months now, so I’d like to ask for support again: Could you give me a hint where to best locate these tests so that they fit...
Thank you for your feedback @weskamm , and I’m happy that this helps you, @justb4 ! We are currently only using this for seeding. I don’t know yet when I’ll...
This looks like exactly what I need just now. Is there a reason why it has not been merged?
Thank you for checking! We might have to roll this out on one or two seednodes first to check whether it throttles announcements too much. I’ve seen a seednode have...
This looks like a good start. Thank you! It will need some additional tightening of security before we can merge it: - Without additional checking for user rights, there should...
If you could take a stab that would be great! Thank you!