Alexander Volkovsky

@Peque , the same applies to all functions :) At the moment, `pyxirr` doesn't support vectorized calculations. I have it in the [roadmap](https://github.com/Anexen/pyxirr#roadmap), but I don't have any estimates. Despite...

> I plan on supporting custom package managers per project in #25, would something similar where you specify the command as well help? Yes, it would be great. Regarding other...

I finally managed to get this to work! I think I have developed an approach and will add vectorized versions of functions in the foreseeable future (probably by the end...

Here is my solution that correctly sets `__name__` for both submodule and the function: ```rust #[pymodule] fn supermodule(py: Python, m: &PyModule) -> PyResult { let child_module = PyModule::new(py, "supermodule.submodule")?; submodule(py,...

Hello, @adhimmulia Thank you for the detailed description and sorry it took me so long to reply. I think the problem is in the initial estimate for the optimization algorithm....

Initial guess has been improved in v0.10.6

Hello, @rogerleung This is not possible at the moment because PyXIRR uses several optimization algorithms to find a solution and each algorithm requires its own configuration. In general, PyXIRR has...

Thank you for providing the data. This is a complicated case. Just checked GoogleSheets and LibreOffice, they are both return 230.80406 (or 23080%). I agree that -59% seems to be...

The initial guess has been improved in v0.10.6. `xirr` function now returns -59% for your example with the default parameters.

I agree. I will change this in the next release.