Andrea Cimmino Arriaga

yes,I agree, just commented that as well #75

I agree, having an API specification (if this goes in that direction, maybe MQTT as well?) will help the adoption. I think SPARQL will help to unlock new distributed scenarios...

Well, in the last meetings we are discussing a lot on the enforcement and several implementations exist. We are not that far I think. About MQTT, yes, just citing a...

Yes, but I think the refinements stand for a certain additional information that, in this case, an action demands. It's a bit odd, at least to me, that such information...

During the evaluation the evaluator (software) must know the resolution that is written in the policy since it is need by the action implementation; without such value is unlike that...

I read the profile, but saw nothing about the result or the input for an ODRL evaluator. Maybe the vocabulary can be used, but I think the evaluation deserves a...

I missed to add also `odrl:Agreement` as evaluable policy. I just edited the issue `I don't agree with odrl:Set being the only one to be evaluated, IMHO it is the...

The pseudocode don't seem that far from the one presented in the [ODRE article](https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17602). However there are things that should be formally defined as they are know a reader does...

I agree with this: "_I think "What is a world" and the rest of the questions in the first paragraph should be defined in https://w3c.github.io/odrl/formal-semantics/ as part of a glossary._"...

Following this thread, I think I would like to discuss in order to later include in the ODRL standard, either in the formal semantics or in a new working draft...