AndreVale69

Hi, I would like to work on this issue. I noticed that other documents also have the same problem. For example: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/blob/0e31573f5dc15f439268fb0861a93c52932ac368/docs/manage-fileset-metadata-using-gravitino.md?plain=1#L88-L93 Also: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/blob/0e31573f5dc15f439268fb0861a93c52932ac368/docs/manage-model-metadata-using-gravitino.md?plain=1#L76-L81 And others. Can I work on...

If it is okay for you, I will work on this issue. Can you please assign me? Since it is not a short-term task. Solving this issue will close #6577...

> hi [@AndreVale69](https://github.com/AndreVale69) sure, I assgined this to you. Thank you for your interest Gravitino! Hi @xunliu, and thanks for your response! While working on the issue #6581, @yuqi1129 proposed...

> Please do not break the compatibility when you change the method signature, I think this is the most important thing to me. Maybe this is a stupid question, but...

@Abyss-lord Could you please add #7491 to the list? I think #7437 should be added as well.

> Thanks! but unfortunately, I think we don't need this, as `Catalog.Type` is already clear enough. As @yuqi1129 suggested, I could try to modify the Python API to achieve consistency...