Mateusz Burzyński

We are in the process of rewriting the extension to improve v5 compatibility. This feature isn't exactly on our MVP list but the rewrite will allow us to implement this...

I now really really wonder if we just couldn't improve this situation in TS itself. It doesn't sound unreasonable for this to work: ```ts declare function setup(_: { actions: TActions...

A CI job for windows would be appreciated regardless - it might be good to PR it separately from this. I'm similarly worried about the changed behavior but as long...

Interestingly, I can't repro it using the bug workbench: [workbench](https://www.typescriptlang.org/dev/bug-workbench/?noUnusedLocals=true&noUnusedParameters=true&skipLibCheck=true&checkJs=true&allowJs=true&moduleResolution=100&out=true&outDir=dist&allowImportingTsExtensions=true&noEmit=true&ts=5.8.0-dev.20250103#code/PTAEAEEMBtoewO4CkDOAuUAXATgVwKYBQIEAxgBb6kDWqGOBxY4AdnAKIC2AlpvXkRLg4uTABFu2DABNuKTEwhsAqi1wp80gDJxSMdFgGLWcVes0AFSNkid8mfNgMNBzGPAQBJTgAc42TG4WAHMAFRR2AA8HFhRuOFj+RiFOOGlcaHwMfBQWfGjjVPTMgCUcuGhReJYMACNcFmlM7GMUam4fLW5agGFKGiSiYwAzbkyWWyysAE8fHIA6aXnMFEJ8vwCZudBvDYdpUNn8UABeUABySHPQAB8L2vPCEbH8CbsMUcz5gCtV4gAqf4Qbi+fyYUAAb12YM0hzmAF9QMNsHBOBd5sBMEcUItlihrv9gE9gICIFjthCAMr2AA80ICsKOAD5EYS1pE9qBSAl5KAfORIBoUKdQHkEKBqZgABQAbUu5wANPdzgBdACUQA)

I'd accept PR exporting this. Just a note - in the next major version this fork will get quite small: https://github.com/emotion-js/emotion/blob/49108c893d50fe95dca1f4b13390dd1ede80c57e/packages/cache/src/prefixer.ts

> we were wondering if there's a tentative date for Emotion v12 Unfortunately, not yet. The problem is that the new React 19 APIs we'd like to use are over...

I believe that all meta-frameworks should configure the conditions like this. Some already do. So by doing that the tool can make sure that it behaves like the rest of...

I've done *short* research and now I'm not sure how many metaframeworks do this already. Many are but to a great extent they might rely on bundling the server code....

It's a current design limitation. A conditional type like this can't produce a generic function, type parameters are **erased** and replaced with what got inferred for them (and that can...

You already have an example of that in your playground. A runtime-level call can produce a new "adapted" generic signature and you are already returning one from this call: `wrapReturnA(someFn)`....