Alexandra Livadas

@christinerogers Concerning your comment about re-ordering the sections, I have changed their order to what I think is most valuable for outside developers: 1. Working off your fork, 2. Issues,...

@christinerogers I implemented the changes you requested above and also read through the document to check for tone issues. I removed a majority of the "Code Review Etiquette" section and...

@christinerogers What do you think about @laemtl's comment about adding this to ReadTheDocs?

@christinerogers @driusan Do you mind re-reviewing with the updated RTD formatting? Here is the [link](https://loris-fork.readthedocs.io/en/2020-08-13-developersguidemarkdown/docs/wiki/99_Developers/Developers_Guide.html) to see the RTD view.

@driusan @christinerogers This is ready for review. All links are working and I've read over the content carefully :) Here is a [link ](https://loris-fork.readthedocs.io/en/2020-08-13-developersguidemarkdown/docs/wiki/99_Developers/Developers_Guide.html)to the ReadTheDocs

> Other than the requested changes.... I'm not a big fan of the rebasing explanations partly because it's not our duty, these are not LORIS specific rebasing instructions, and partly...

@driusan This PR is ready for review :)

@driusan I just fixed the conflict! The mkdocs version in `readthedocs/requirements.txt` has been updated since this PR was made so the conflict was in that file.

Resolved by #6907

@zaliqarosli I'm pretty sure this issue was resolved by #6907.