Alex Waygood

> as we have established, actual typecheckers do not approve of this approach: `warning: Import "typing_extensions" could not be resolved from source (reportMissingModuleSource)` I don't _think_ that warning would impact...

I prefer the new style. It's more verbose in some situations, yes, but it makes it very easy to see how many context managers there are in any given `with`...

> In [the playground](https://black.vercel.app/?version=stable&state=_Td6WFoAAATm1rRGAgAhARYAAAB0L-Wj4ACUAFpdAD2IimZxl1N_WlXnON2nzNCa_QqBAQtCeZv7ozfAdoKbfHGTVDnoeAovGRAxLiuSSjYzfwcG5engTB1WPSEb83ZYxJ0yg9Bo0wgUVUfPxeYUjCZbp8x2ikKQrAAAAJoWzpj2XOSIAAF2lQEAAAAE9XS_scRn-wIAAAAABFla), it looks like your proposed style is already in use? See #1646 Only if it's a class immediately above a decorated class. Not if it's a...

#4041 is the better solution, no?

My ¢2 as a Black user: 1. I generally agree with @hauntsaninja's vibes/analysis overall! 2. I ran Black with `--preview` on a few projects, and in those projects, I'm sad...

This is actually something I've noticed quite a few times when it comes to black's formatting of typeshed's stubs, so I don't think it's *that* uncommon. I quite like @bersbersbers's...

My local repro is now fixed -- thanks! However, I'm still seeing the strange errors over at https://github.com/AlexWaygood/typeshed-stats/pull/189 (which is now using `uv==0.1.4`). I thought those errors had the same...

Since the original repro at the top of this issue is now fixed, I'll close this and open a new, more targeted issue

This is the new issue: - #1639

> (off-topic) Ough, I missed PEP695 somehow, it looks like python going the wrong way, too much typing-specific syntax, current `TypeVar` is awesome compared to that:( The PEP hasn't been...