Alessandro Minoccheri

@alessandro-candon we released version `0.2.28` with the new architectural filter. Can you please give us feedback about your problem? Then we can understand together what could be the next step

No problem for the delay @alessandro-candon! Let me know if we can do something for your project, at the moment I keep the issue open and I am waiting for...

Hi @benr77 you are right, I created a little test about the behavior and we need to check inside extend class other dependencies. Broken test to validate the expected behavior:...

Hi @benr77, we have discussed this bug / new feature and we think that at the moment we would like to avoid implementing a parser that finds all dependencies inherited...

Hi @lchrusciel we have discussed it many times and at the moment we are checking only the single class without building the full tree of inheritance. I understand your point...

Hi @lchrusciel we are working on this PR #239 to solve your problem by getting dependencies recursively. At the moment I tried to add in local into Sylius this rule:...

@lchrusciel it's a delicate thing the recursive search, for this reason I am thinking to merge this PR but with a different method to give to users two options: -...

Did you try to generate the phar file without those lines and verify that it works fine? Can we automate this check? * Generate phar * using phar with some...

The smoke test was done for that: test the phar generation. @micheleorselli what do you think?

Which error do you get @fain182 ? It's about `/tmp/..` permission, right?