Alessandro Bono

Thank you, now I understand why it is like that. The local callback method can be seen as an "active check" while the procmon is a "passive check". The callback...

> The code to implement this is very simple. The biggest challenge is the deficit we have in the testing of it. I appreciate the external validation that people did...

Hello, thanks for the feedback! The build log looks fine to me. I suspect we only have builds in x86_64 and arm64 because the kde runtime is present only for...

> > Hello, thanks for the feedback! The build log looks fine to me. I suspect we only have builds in x86_64 and arm64 because the kde runtime is present...

This has been fixed with https://github.com/flathub/org.genivi.DLTViewer/commit/10923e1179472e1d20684cb5a4ae038fde8c9eff

This looks like it might be fixed in `master` with https://github.com/xiph/opus/commit/20c032d27c59d65b19b8ffbb2608e5282fe817eb. Could you please check?

That sounds like another error. On my side the error `Unknown variable "have_arm_intrinsics_or_asm"` is fixed with https://github.com/xiph/opus/commit/20c032d27c59d65b19b8ffbb2608e5282fe817eb.

Kind of related, I've opened https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-91091 on the Qt side.

LGTM

I worked around the issue about the missing `Config.cmake.in` file by including it here. However the compilation via cmake still fails.